<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Longevity Project &#187; Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelongevityproject.com/category/definitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelongevityproject.com</link>
	<description>Information center for prevention, cognition and sustainable aging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ten-Year Comparison of the Influence of Organic and Conventional Crop Management Practices on the Content of Flavonoids in Tomatoes</title>
		<link>http://thelongevityproject.com/ten-year-comparison-of-the-influence-of-organic-and-conventional-crop-management-practices-on-the-content-of-flavonoids-in-tomatoes/</link>
		<comments>http://thelongevityproject.com/ten-year-comparison-of-the-influence-of-organic-and-conventional-crop-management-practices-on-the-content-of-flavonoids-in-tomatoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavonoid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavonol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaempferol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quercetin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tomato]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongevityproject.com/ten-year-comparison-of-the-influence-of-organic-and-conventional-crop-management-practices-on-the-content-of-flavonoids-in-tomatoes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understanding how environment, crop management, and other factors, particularly soil fertility, influence the composition and quality of food crops is necessary for the production of high-quality nutritious foods. The flavonoid aglycones quercetin and kaempferol were measured in dried tomato samples (Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Halley 3155) that had been archived over the period from 1994 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understanding how environment, crop management, and other factors, particularly soil fertility, influence the composition and quality of food crops is necessary for the production of high-quality nutritious foods. The flavonoid aglycones quercetin and kaempferol were measured in dried tomato samples (Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Halley 3155) that had been archived over the period from 1994 to 2004 from the Long-Term Research on Agricultural Systems project (LTRAS) at the University of California-Davis, which began in 1993. Conventional and organic processing tomato production systems are part of the set of systems compared at LTRAS. Comparisons of analyses of archived samples from conventional and organic production systems demonstrated statistically higher levels (P &lt; 0.05) of quercetin and kaempferol aglycones in organic tomatoes. Ten-year mean levels of quercetin and kaempferol in organic tomatoes [115.5 and 63.3 mg g-1 of dry matter (DM)] were 79 and 97% higher than those in conventional tomatoes (64.6 and 32.06 mg g-1 of DM), respectively. The levels of flavonoids increased over time in samples from organic treatments, whereas the levels of flavonoids did not vary significantly in conventional treatments. This increase corresponds not only with increasing amounts of soil organic matter accumulating in organic plots but also with reduced manure application rates once soils in the organic systems had reached equilibrium levels of organic matter. Well-quantified changes in tomato nutrients over years in organic farming systems have not been reported previously.</p>
<p>Full article: <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/searchRedirect.cgi/jafcau/2007/55/i15/html/jf070344+.html">html</a>, <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/searchRedirect.cgi/jafcau/2007/55/i15/pdf/jf070344+.pdf">pdf</a></p>
<p>Alyson E. Mitchell,* Yun-Jeong Hong, Eunmi Koh, Diane M. Barrett, D. E. Bryant, R. Ford Denison,# and Stephen Kaffka</p>
<p>J. Agric. Food Chem., 55 (15), 6154 -6159, 2007. 10.1021/jf070344+ S0021-8561(07)00344-5</p>
<p>Department of Food Science and Technology and Department of Plant Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California-Davis, Davis, California 95616, and Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelongevityproject.com/ten-year-comparison-of-the-influence-of-organic-and-conventional-crop-management-practices-on-the-content-of-flavonoids-in-tomatoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimal vitamin D status for colorectal cancer prevention: a quantitative meta analysis</title>
		<link>http://thelongevityproject.com/optimal-vitamin-d-status-for-colorectal-cancer-prevention-a-quantitative-meta-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://thelongevityproject.com/optimal-vitamin-d-status-for-colorectal-cancer-prevention-a-quantitative-meta-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamin D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongevityproject.com/optimal-vitamin-d-status-for-colorectal-cancer-prevention-a-quantitative-meta-analysis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

BACKGROUND: Previous studies, such as the Women&#8217;s Health Initiative, have shown that a low dose of vitamin D did not protect against colorectal cancer, yet a meta-analysis indicates that a higher dose may reduce its incidence. METHODS: Five studies of serum 25(OH)D in association with colorectal cancer risk were identified using PubMed. The results of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl class="PubmedArticle">
<dd class="abstract">
<p class="abstract">BACKGROUND: Previous studies, such as the Women&#8217;s Health Initiative, have shown that a low dose of vitamin D did not protect against colorectal cancer, yet a meta-analysis indicates that a higher dose may reduce its incidence. METHODS: Five studies of serum 25(OH)D in association with colorectal cancer risk were identified using PubMed. The results of all five serum studies were combined using standard methods for pooled analysis. The pooled results were divided into quintiles with median 25(OH)D values of 6, 16, 22, 27, and 37 ng/mL. Odds ratios were calculated by quintile of the pooled data using Peto&#8217;s Assumption-Free Method, with the lowest quintile of 25(OH)D as the reference group. A dose-response curve was plotted based on the odds for each quintile of the pooled data. Data were abstracted and analyzed in 2006. RESULTS: Odds ratios for the combined serum 25(OH)D studies, from lowest to highest quintile, were 1.00, 0.82, 0.66, 0.59, and 0.46 (p(trend)&lt;0.0001) for colorectal cancer. According to the DerSimonian-Laird test for homogeneity of pooled data, the studies were homogeneous (chi(2)=1.09, df=4, p=0.90. The pooled odds ratio for the highest quintile versus the lowest was 0.49 (p&lt;0.0001, 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.68). A 50% lower risk of colorectal cancer was associated with a serum 25(OH)D level &gt; or =33 ng/mL, compared to &lt; or =12 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date suggests that daily intake of 1000-2000 IU/day of vitamin D(3) could reduce the incidence of colorectal with minimal risk.</p>
<p class="abstract"> <span class="ti"><span title="American journal of preventive medicine.">Am J Prev Med.</span> 2007 Mar;32(3):210-6.</span><span class="featured_linkouts"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/utils/fref.fcgi?PrId=3048&amp;itool=AbstractPlus-def&amp;uid=17296473&amp;db=pubmed&amp;url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749-3797%2806%2900498-3" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/egifs/http:--linkinghub.elsevier.com-ihub-images-PubMedLink.gif" alt="Click here to read" border="0" /></a></span></p>
<dl class="PubmedArticle">
<dt class="head">
<p class="abstitle"><span class="featured_linkouts"> </span><span class="linkbar"><script language="JavaScript1.2"><!--  var Menu17296473 = [    ["UseLocalConfig", "jsmenu3Config", "", ""],   ["Compound via MeSH" , "window.top.location='http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pccompound&#038;DbFrom=pubmed&#038;Cmd=Link&#038;LinkName=pubmed_pccompound_mesh&#038;LinkReadableName=Compound%20via%20MeSH&#038;IdsFromResult=17296473&#038;ordinalpos=1&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus' ", "", ""],   ["Substance via MeSH" , "window.top.location='http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pcsubstance&#038;DbFrom=pubmed&#038;Cmd=Link&#038;LinkName=pubmed_pcsubstance_mesh&#038;LinkReadableName=Substance%20via%20MeSH&#038;IdsFromResult=17296473&#038;ordinalpos=1&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus' ", "", ""],   ["LinkOut", "window.top.location='http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Cmd=ShowLinkOut&#038;Db=pubmed&#038;TermToSearch=17296473&#038;ordinalpos=1&#038;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus' ", "", ""] 				 ] 				 --></script></span></p>
</dt>
<dd class="abstract">
<p class="authors">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="authors"><strong>Gorham ED</strong>, <strong>Garland CF</strong>, <strong>Garland FC</strong>, <strong>Grant WB</strong>, <strong>Mohr SB</strong>, <strong>Lipkin M</strong>, <strong>Newmark HL</strong>, <strong>Giovannucci E</strong>, <strong>Wei M</strong>, <strong>Holick MF</strong>.</p>
<p class="affiliation">University of California San Diego, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA. gorham@nhrc.navy.mil</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p class="abstract">&nbsp;</p>
</dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelongevityproject.com/optimal-vitamin-d-status-for-colorectal-cancer-prevention-a-quantitative-meta-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The French paradox</title>
		<link>http://thelongevityproject.com/the-french-paradox/</link>
		<comments>http://thelongevityproject.com/the-french-paradox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TLP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satured fats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongevityproject.com/the-french-paradox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French paradox is the apparent opposition between a diet rich in saturated fats and alcohol and comparatively low rates of stomach and colon cancer and the second-lowest world incidence of heart disease after Japan. A forum is available to discuss topics on The French paradox.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French paradox is the apparent opposition between a diet rich in saturated fats and alcohol and comparatively low rates of stomach and colon cancer and the second-lowest world incidence of heart disease after Japan. A <a href="http://forums.thelongevityproject.com/forum.php?id=1&amp;page">forum</a> is available to discuss topics on The French paradox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelongevityproject.com/the-french-paradox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
