The role of computer keyboards used by students of a metropolitan university as reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci was determined. Putative methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant staphylococci isolates were identified from keyboard swabs following a combination of biochemical and genetic analyses. Of 24 keyboards surveyed, 17 were contaminated with staphylococci that grew in the presence of oxacillin (2 mg l(-1)). Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), -S. epidermidis (MRSE) and -S. hominis (MRSH) were present on two, five and two keyboards, respectively, while all three staphylococci co-contaminated one keyboard. Furthermore, these were found to be part of a greater community of oxacillin-resistant bacteria. Combined with the broad user base common to public computers, the presence of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci on keyboard surfaces might impact the transmission and prevalence of pathogens throughout the community.

1: ISME J. 2007 Jul;1(3):265-8. Epub 2007 May 31. Links

Kassem II, Sigler V, Esseili MA.

Laboratory for Microbial Ecology, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.

OBJECTIVE: User interfaces of patient data management systems (PDMS) in intensive care units (ICU), like computer keyboard and mouse, may serve as reservoirs for the transmission of microorganisms. Pathogens may be transferred via the hands of personnel to the patient causing nosocomial infections. The purpose of this study was to examine the microbial contamination of computer user interfaces with potentially pathogenic microorganisms, compared with other fomites in a surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Sterile swab samples were received from patient’s bedside computer keyboard and mouse, and three other sites (infusion pumps, ventilator, ward round trolley) in the patient’s room in a 14 bed surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. At the central ward samples from keyboard and mouse of the physician’s workstation, and control buttons of the ward’s intercom and telephone receiver were obtained. Quantitative and qualitative bacteriological sampling occurred during two periods of three months each on eight nonconsecutive days. RESULTS: In all 14 patients’ rooms we collected a total of 1118 samples: 222 samples from keyboards and mice, 214 from infusion pumps and 174 from the ward’s trolley. From the central ward 16 samples per formites were obtained (computer keyboard and mouse at the physician’s workstation and the ward’s intercom and telephone receiver). Microbacterial analysis from samples in patients’ rooms yielded 26 contaminated samples from keyboard and mouse (5.9%) compared with 18 positive results from other fomites within patients’ rooms (3.0%; p < 0.02). At the physician’s computer terminal two samples obtained from the mouse (6.3%) showed positive microbial testing whereas the ward’s intercom and telephone receiver were not contaminated (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The colonization rate for computer keyboard and mouse of a PDMS with potentially pathogenic microorganisms is greater than that of other user interfaces in a surgical ICU. These fomites may be additional reservoirs for the transmision of microorganisms and become vectors for cross-transmission of nosocomial infections in the ICU setting.

1: J Clin Monit Comput. 2004 Feb;18(1):7-12. Links

Hartmann B, Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, Röhrig R, Fengler B, Färber UW, Wille B, Hempelmann G.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Giessen.